Results 51 to 57 of 57
-
17th July 2011, 05:06 PM #51
-
17th July 2011, 06:00 PM #52
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 488
- Thanks
- 8
- Thanked 160 Times in 129 Posts
By "this product" do you mean 0.1% chlorhexidine oral rinses? NO. Respiratory effects from the oral rinses? NO. Deafness from the oral rinses? NO. So you simultaneously admit your knowledge is not related to the 0.1% chlorhexidine oral rinses at all and yet neither admit you were wrong about chlorhexidine oral rinses potentially killing cats, nor apologize for accusing me of suggesting something that could kill cats. Wow. You should be in politics with that kind of non-response response.
Your reasoning that 0.1% chlorhexidine oral rinses are dangerous is analogous to somebody saying that since flushing one's ear with 100% ethyl alcohol when there is a perforated ear drum can cause hearing damage, drinking beer is dangerous.
Bottom line: catslave has presented no evidence to suggest a safety issue with 0.1% chlorhexidine oral rinses and I cannot find any online, they continue to be manufactured by multiple pet product companies, and they are frequently recommended by vets around the world, for cats with gingivitis issues.Last edited by mcguy; 17th July 2011 at 07:18 PM.
-
17th July 2011, 08:00 PM #53
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Norfolk,UK
- Posts
- 3,709
- Thanks
- 433
- Thanked 675 Times in 648 Posts
- Images
- 47
-
The Following User Says Thank You to jckkerrison For This Useful Post:
Jolly (17th July 2011)
-
17th July 2011, 08:57 PM #54
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 488
- Thanks
- 8
- Thanked 160 Times in 129 Posts
And confirming that catslave has no evidence at all that chlorhexidine dental rinses kill cats--as she claimed earlier in the thread--but will not come out and clearly state--is not relevant to this thread's purpose? I cannot disagree more strongly with you! If somebody makes false claims that a product is deadly, this needs to be cleared up definitively or the info on this forum will be completely untrustworthy and therefore useless. If that is going to be the case, just to "be nice," then I don't want any association with this forum. I thought Dave was trying to set this forum up as a primary source of useful information for Maine Coon owners. So what would a new MC owner think about the safety of chlorhexidine oral rinses after reading the earlier portion of this thread? Sorry if somebody's feelings are hurt, but there needed to be a summary of the fact that no evidence pertaining to a lack of safety of these oral rinses has been able to be shown, because the issues cited arise with different formulations and applications for chlorhexidine.
Last edited by mcguy; 17th July 2011 at 09:17 PM.
-
17th July 2011, 10:28 PM #55
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Norfolk,UK
- Posts
- 3,709
- Thanks
- 433
- Thanked 675 Times in 648 Posts
- Images
- 47
I don't think anyone is trying to say that the forum should not post truthful things that will help us all,in this case I think some are trying to say this has gone a bit deep on someone elses thread,hence my remark that perhaps it might be an idea to ask Dave if we could have a section where these deeper matters could be carried over & not spoil the light hearted intentions of the original thread.
I would look into anything that was disagreed on anyway to draw my own conclusions if I thought it was something that affected my cat & I had thought about doing or using it that is the good thing about the forum,the things it brings to light but it is also a great forum because it is so friendly....x
-
17th July 2011, 11:39 PM #56
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Dublin,Ireland
- Posts
- 536
- Thanks
- 144
- Thanked 57 Times in 45 Posts
- Images
- 27
I have decided to close this thread as it has gone way off the original topic.
I am aware that there are differences of opinion by many of us Maine coon/cat owners on this forum and discussion of these opinions are welcomed and encouraged HOWEVER members are kindly reminded to respect other members points of view, and also to keep this forum family friendly by not using foul language!
Members are most welcome to start a new thread to discuss the merits of "feeding raw food" or any other issues which have come up on this thread :-)
-
The Following User Says Thank You to IrishKitty For This Useful Post:
Peter Galbavy (18th July 2011)
-
18th July 2011, 09:35 AM #57
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Yorkshire, United Kingdom
- Posts
- 278
- Thanks
- 33
- Thanked 141 Times in 68 Posts
- Images
- 106
Wow what happened here over the weekend !!!???
Certainly a lot of differences of opinion, but different subjects from the opening post. As IrishKitty pointed out, remember folks that we ALL are entitle to an opinion and undoubetedly our opinions will clash. As frustrating as it may seems sometimes - we cannot always convince others to come around to our way of thinking when the other is just as convinced as you that they are right. Sooo put your point across and then let it be, there is never ever going to be anything resolved if we lost our temper and convey that in our messages.. Be calm, make your point and then go look at some cute pics in the gallery or read another thread.
We certainly don't want to encourage people NOT to air their thoughts, this is the nature of forums/dicussions groups but there's a right way and wrong way and sometimes its too easy to go the wrong way.
One big point, No vulgarity - EVER! It doesn't strengthen your argument, it will only fuel anger across parties, and remember there is no age restriction on here. There are children who also read this forum and I'm sure you would rather kids see how adults engage in healthy debate rather than heated shouting matches.
And just to re-iterate, if you see the thread going off topic from the original post, then don't hesitate to create a new thread.
That's all I have to say on the subject.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dave For This Useful Post:
Peter Galbavy (18th July 2011), Walter Coonkat (19th July 2011)
Bookmarks